A Defense of Daenerys Targaryen’s Arc (And Why It Actually Makes Sense)

Let’s talk about the moment that split the Game of Thrones fanbase in half like a sword through butter. The moment that had Reddit exploding, Twitter erupting, and casual viewers texting their friends asking “did she really just…?” We’re talking about Daenerys Targaryen’s descent into madness and her burning of King’s Landing in the show’s final season. It’s become one of the most controversial plot points in television history, with legions of fans insisting it came out of nowhere and ruined an otherwise iconic character. But here’s the thing—and I say this as someone who initially had reservations too—the seeds for Daenerys’s fall were planted from the very first episode. They just grew so slowly, hidden among all her other qualities, that we didn’t notice them until the tree had already poisoned everything around it.

The Girl Who Would Have Kings Burn

When we first meet Daenerys, she’s a terrified, thirteen-year-old girl (in the books) being married off to a barbarian warlord. She has nothing—no army, no dragons, no claim to anything. She’s a refugee, a pauper, the last surviving child of a deposed dynasty. But here’s what’s important: she never stops believing that she’s meant for something greater. That’s not modesty. That’s not hope. That’s a specific kind of certainty that defines her throughout the series.

Throughout the show’s early seasons, we watch Daenerys liberate slaves. This is heroic, absolutely. She’s undeniably on the right side of history when she frees enslaved people across Essos. But notice something: she doesn’t just free them. She presents herself as their savior. She accepts their worship. She lets them call her “Mother” and “Dragon” and “Breaker of Chains.” These are people who were literally enslaved, traumatized, and dependent—and Daenerys becomes the object of their total devotion. That’s intoxicating, and she’s clearly intoxicated by it.

Even in these early heroic moments, there’s a pattern establishing itself. Daenerys doesn’t collaborate with advisors—she overrules them. She doesn’t compromise—she finds reasons why her way is the only moral way. When Ser Jorah warns her against reckless decisions, she thanks him for his counsel and then does exactly what she wanted to do anyway. When Missandei or Tyrion try to offer perspective, she listens with the patience of someone already certain she knows best. These aren’t the actions of a villain, but they’re the actions of someone who is dangerously certain in her own righteousness.

The Righteousness That Corrupts

One of the most underrated aspects of Daenerys’s character is her unshakeable belief that she is destined to rule. Not because she wants it necessarily—she tells herself she never wanted the throne—but because she believes it’s her birthright and her duty. This conviction becomes its own kind of tyranny. She’s not trying to become a tyrant; she genuinely believes that what she’s doing is best for everyone. That’s what makes her so dangerous.

Think about the people who support her throughout the series. The Unsullied follow her with religious fervor. Her Dothraki riders treat her like a god. Even hardened political players like Tyrion and Varys eventually throw their weight behind her, not because they necessarily trust her judgment, but because they believe she’s the best option available. And Daenerys never questions this devotion. She never wonders if maybe her followers are wrong to be so absolutist. She doesn’t ask herself whether love born from fear of dragons is really love at all.

The crucial turning point—and this is something people often miss—is when Daenerys faces the possibility of not getting what she believes is hers. When she arrives in Westeros, she expects the continent to fall at her feet. After all, she’s the rightful queen, isn’t she? But the people of Westeros don’t care about her claim. They don’t know her. They don’t revere her. And when she learns that Jon Snow has a better claim than she does, something shifts in her.

The Slow Descent Into Certainty

Watch the final two seasons more carefully, and you’ll see Daenerys becoming increasingly unstable, increasingly convinced that anyone who doesn’t immediately submit to her rule is an enemy. She becomes obsessed with loyalty tests. When Varys—her most experienced advisor—suggests that perhaps there are other options, she has him executed. She doesn’t torture him for information; she doesn’t interrogate him. She just burns him alive because he questioned her judgment.

This is the moment many people point to and say “that’s where it went wrong!” But actually, it’s the logical endpoint of the character we’ve been watching for eight seasons. Daenerys has always eliminated anyone who stands in her way. She’s always believed that her cause is just. She’s always accepted absolute devotion from her followers while remaining suspicious of anyone who might challenge her. What’s changed is not her character—it’s the scale at which she can now operate.

When she has no real power, these traits make her sympathetic. We root for the underdog girl with dragons. But as her power grows, those same traits become monstrous. The person who burned the Tarlys for not bending the knee, the person who was willing to destroy King’s Landing if it meant eliminating her enemies, the person who became convinced that everyone was betraying her—this person was always in there. We just preferred to ignore her because Daenerys was also doing genuinely heroic things.

And that’s the tragedy of her arc, and also the brilliance of it. Daenerys isn’t a villain because she suddenly became evil. She’s a cautionary tale about how righteousness, combined with absolute power and unquestioning devotion, can corrupt even the best intentions.

The Loneliness of the Dragon

One element that people often overlook is how isolating Daenerys’s position becomes. She’s the last of her line. She has no equal. Everyone around her is either a subject, a servant, or a romantic interest. She has no peers. She has no one she can truly confide in without worrying about their loyalty. That kind of isolation is psychologically devastating, especially for someone who has the power to destroy anyone who threatens her.

By the time she reaches Westeros, she’s surrounded by people she doesn’t trust. Varys wants something from her. Tyrion is from the family that destroyed her own. Jon Snow turns out to have a better claim than she does. Even the Northern lords don’t embrace her. And slowly, her resentment builds. If everyone is ungrateful, if everyone is disloyal, if everyone is an enemy, then maybe the only solution is to rule through fear.

The show actually gives us a moment of clarity in Season 8, Episode 5, when Daenerys sits in the throne room of a conquered King’s Landing and realizes that she can never have the love and loyalty she craves. She can have submission. She can have fear. She can have the empty devotion of those dependent on her power. But she can never have genuine love and trust from an equal, because she’s no longer capable of being with an equal—she’s the Dragon, the Queen, the Breaker of Chains. And so she chooses what she can have: absolute power, absolute submission.

Why This Matters

The reason I’m defending Daenerys’s arc isn’t because I think burning King’s Landing was good or justified. It wasn’t. It was a atrocity, a war crime, an act of terrorism committed against a civilian population. But that’s exactly the point. The show is arguing that good intentions, when combined with absolute power and surrounded by people who won’t challenge you, can lead to atrocity just as surely as malice can.

This is actually a more complex and challenging message than “the tyrant was secretly evil all along.” It’s saying that the person who freed slaves and fought against injustice can become a monster. It’s saying that the traits that made her heroic—her determination, her unwillingness to compromise, her certainty in her cause—are the same traits that made her monstrous. It’s saying that power doesn’t corrupt just bad people; it corrupts everyone, eventually, if they’re not careful.

Is the execution of this in the final season somewhat rushed? Absolutely. A full season devoted to watching Daenerys’s isolation and paranoia spiral out of control would have been more dramatically satisfying. But the arc itself, when you trace it from beginning to end, makes perfect sense.

The Conclusion We Had to Accept

Daenerys Targaryen’s journey is a tragedy precisely because it’s so sensible, so logical, so inevitable once you start looking at it from the right angle. She was always going to arrive in Westeros expecting worship and finding resistance. She was always going to interpret that resistance as betrayal. And given that she had an army, a navy, and three nuclear weapons in the form of dragons, she was always going to have the means to eliminate anyone who stood in her way.

The beautiful, terrible part of her story is that we understood her. We sympathized with her. We rooted for her. And then, when her power aligned with her certainty and her isolation, we watched her become the very thing she claimed to oppose: a tyrant willing to kill thousands of innocents to consolidate power. That’s not a character assassination. That’s a character arc, complete and devastating.

Maybe that’s not the ending fans wanted. But looking back at everything that came before, it’s hard to argue it’s the ending she didn’t earn.